panama: was chosen as site for canal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.63
, south america
Weight: 0.62
, central american country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.58
, central america
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, north america
Weight: 0.35
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.35
, south africa
Weight: 0.35
, mexico
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was chosen as site for canal 1.00
was chosen for site for canal 1.00
was chosen as site for canal joining 0.94
was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific 0.91
was selected as place for panama canal 0.90
be location of canal 0.90
was picked for canal 0.89
was chosen as site 0.89
was chosen for site 0.89
was chose as sight for canal 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen for site for canal)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen for site for canal)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen for site for canal)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(panama, be location of canal)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(panama, be location of canal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(panama, was picked for canal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(panama, was picked for canal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen for site)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panama, be location of canal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(panama, was picked for canal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen for site)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen for site)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site for canal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(panama, was picked for canal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(panama, be location of canal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)