panama: was selected as place for panama canal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.63
, south america
Weight: 0.62
, central american country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.58
, central america
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, north america
Weight: 0.35
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.35
, south africa
Weight: 0.35
, mexico
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was selected as place for panama canal 1.00
was chosen as site for canal 0.90
was chosen for site for canal 0.89
was picked for canal 0.87
was chose as sight for canal 0.87
was chosen as site for canal joining 0.87
was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific 0.87
was ideal place for construction of canal 0.86
be location of canal 0.85
build canal than nicaragua 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen for site for canal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(panama, was picked for canal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(panama, was ideal place for construction of canal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(panama, be location of canal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(panama, build canal than nicaragua)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(panama, build canal than nicaragua)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(panama, was picked for canal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen for site for canal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen for site for canal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(panama, was picked for canal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(panama, build canal than nicaragua)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(panama, was ideal place for construction of canal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(panama, build canal than nicaragua)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(panama, was ideal place for construction of canal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panama, be location of canal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(panama, was picked for canal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(panama, be location of canal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(panama, was ideal place for construction of canal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site for canal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(panama, be location of canal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)