panda bear: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.73
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, artist
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.55
Siblings panda
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.40
, giant panda
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.39
, bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
be in danger of extinction 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bear, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bear, be in danger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red panda, be in danger)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be in danger of extinction)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(red panda, be in danger of extinction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(panda bear, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in danger of extinction)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(panda bear, be in danger of extinction)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be in danger of extinction)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger of extinction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, be in danger of extinction)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red panda, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)