panda bear: is really bears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.73
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, artist
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.55
Siblings panda
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.40
, giant panda
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.39
, bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is really bears 1.00
is bears 0.93
be called bears 0.92
be different from bears 0.90
be different from other bears 0.87
be called panda bears 0.80
be classified as bear 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be called bears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(bear, be called bears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(grizzly bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, be called bears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(panda bear, is really bears)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(panda bear, is bears)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(panda bear, be different from bears)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(panda bear, be called bears)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be called bears)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(panda bear, be called panda bears)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(panda bear, be called bears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be different from bears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(panda bear, be classified as bear)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(panda bear, is bears)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(panda bear, be different from other bears)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be called panda bears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be called bears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(panda bear, be different from bears)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be different from other bears)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(panda bear, is bears)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(panda bear, be called panda bears)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(panda bear, be classified as bear)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is bears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(panda bear, be different from other bears)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be different from other bears)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be different from bears)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be classified as bear)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be classified as bear)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be called panda bears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(panda bear, is really bears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be called bears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is really bears)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bear, be called bears)