panda: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, bear
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.41
, giant panda
Weight: 0.40
, red panda
Weight: 0.40
, orangutan
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
be in danger becoming 0.88
be under threat 0.84
be at risk 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bear, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bear, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(bear, be at risk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bear, be in danger)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at risk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be at risk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be at risk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be at risk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bear, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red panda, be in danger)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be in danger)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(red panda, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(red panda, be at risk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(giant panda, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be at risk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(orangutan, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be at risk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(panda, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(panda, be under threat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(panda, be at risk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(panda, be under threat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(panda, be at risk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(panda, be under threat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(panda, be at risk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(panda, be at risk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bear, be at risk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(giant panda, be under threat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red panda, be at risk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(giant panda, be at risk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(orangutan, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(orangutan, be at risk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red panda, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bear, be at risk)