panda: be under threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, bear
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.41
, giant panda
Weight: 0.40
, red panda
Weight: 0.40
, orangutan
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under threat 1.00
be in danger 0.84
be in danger becoming 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(panda, be under threat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bear, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bear, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(panda, be under threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red panda, be in danger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be in danger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(panda, be under threat)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(panda, be in danger)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger becoming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(panda, be under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(giant panda, be under threat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(orangutan, be in danger)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red panda, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)