:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(panda, is zoo)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(panda, is zoo)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bear, is zoo)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is zoo)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is panda)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(panda, is zoo)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(panda, is zoo)
Similarity expansion
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(panda, be in zoo)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(panda, be in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(panda, live in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(panda, be in zoo)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(panda, live in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(panda, live in zoo)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in zoo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(panda, live in zoo)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
Typical implies Plausible
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(panda, is zoo)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is zoo)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, is panda)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(panda bear, is zoo)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(giant panda, is zoo)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(red panda, is zoo)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is zoo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be in zoo)