panel: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
Siblings eminent domain
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.31
, topic
Weight: 0.31
, moderator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
be good for environment 0.97
help environment 0.87
benefit environment 0.82
has quality bad 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
go bad 0.77
has quality good 0.77
is bad idea 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(board, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panel, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panel, be bad for environment)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panel, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(board, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(board, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(eminent domain, is bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(eminent domain, help environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(board, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(panel, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(panel, be bad for environment)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(panel, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(eminent domain, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(eminent domain, help environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(eminent domain, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(eminent domain, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(eminent domain, is bad thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(eminent domain, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(panel, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(panel, be good for environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(panel, help environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(panel, help environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(panel, be good for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(panel, benefit environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(panel, help environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(panel, go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(panel, go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(panel, go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(panel, go bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(panel, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(panel, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(panel, be good for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(panel, benefit environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(panel, is bad idea)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(panel, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(panel, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(panel, benefit environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(panel, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(panel, be good for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(panel, is bad idea)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(panel, is bad idea)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(panel, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(panel, help environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(panel, is bad idea)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panel, benefit environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panel, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(board, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(eminent domain, help environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(eminent domain, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(eminent domain, is bad thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(eminent domain, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(board, has quality good)