panel: be illegal in florida

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
Siblings eminent domain
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.31
, topic
Weight: 0.31
, moderator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in florida 1.00
is kansas city missouri 0.79
is virginia 0.78
is illegal 0.77
be such problem in america 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panel, be illegal in florida)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(eminent domain, is virginia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(topic, is kansas city missouri)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(panel, be illegal in florida)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(eminent domain, is virginia)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(eminent domain, is virginia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(topic, is kansas city missouri)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(topic, is kansas city missouri)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(panel, be illegal in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panel, is illegal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(panel, is illegal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(panel, is illegal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(panel, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panel, be illegal in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panel, be illegal in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(eminent domain, is virginia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(topic, is kansas city missouri)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(panel, be illegal in florida)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)