panel: beat expensive

Related concepts

Parents	board Weight: 0.64 , issue Weight: 0.61 , project Weight: 0.59 , application Weight: 0.58
Siblings	eminent domain Weight: 0.32 , court case Weight: 0.31 , hearing aid Weight: 0.31 , topic Weight: 0.31 , moderator Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
beat expensive	1.00
is expensive	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(panel, beat expensive)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(board, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(panel, beat expensive)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(panel, beat expensive)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(panel, beat expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(board, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(issue, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(issue, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(court case, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(panel, beat expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(board, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(panel, beat expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(panel, beat expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(panel, beat expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(court case, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(court case, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(panel, beat expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(panel, is expensive)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(panel, is expensive)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(panel, beat expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(application, is expensive)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(board, is expensive)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(court case, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(application, is expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(board, is expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(panel, beat expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)