panel: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
Siblings eminent domain
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.31
, topic
Weight: 0.31
, moderator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
be good for environment 0.80
be bad for environment 0.77
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(board, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(panel, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(panel, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(panel, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(board, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(board, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(board, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(panel, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(panel, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(panel, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(eminent domain, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(eminent domain, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(eminent domain, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(panel, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(panel, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(panel, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(panel, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(panel, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(panel, be good for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(panel, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(panel, be good for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(panel, is best)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(panel, is best)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(panel, be good for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(panel, be good for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(panel, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(panel, is best)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panel, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(panel, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(panel, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(board, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(eminent domain, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(eminent domain, has quality wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(eminent domain, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(panel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(board, has quality good)