panel: have efficient energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
Siblings eminent domain
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.31
, topic
Weight: 0.31
, moderator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have efficient energy 1.00
is efficient 0.94
have energy 0.88
impact use of renewable energy 0.83
turn energy into electricity 0.82
lose efficiency 0.81
lose efficiency with heat 0.81
lose efficiency over time 0.80
impact use of energy 0.79
generate electricity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(issue, impact use of energy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(panel, have efficient energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use of energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use of renewable energy)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use of energy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(issue, impact use of energy)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(panel, have efficient energy)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(panel, is efficient)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(panel, have energy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(panel, turn energy into electricity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(panel, lose efficiency)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(panel, lose efficiency with heat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(panel, turn energy into electricity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(panel, have energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(panel, lose efficiency over time)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(panel, lose efficiency with heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(panel, lose efficiency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(panel, have energy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(panel, turn energy into electricity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(panel, have energy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(panel, generate electricity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(panel, lose efficiency over time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(panel, is efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(panel, generate electricity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(panel, lose efficiency with heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(panel, lose efficiency)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(panel, lose efficiency over time)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(panel, turn energy into electricity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(panel, generate electricity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(panel, is efficient)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(panel, lose efficiency with heat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(panel, lose efficiency)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(panel, lose efficiency over time)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(panel, is efficient)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(panel, generate electricity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(panel, have efficient energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of energy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of energy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(panel, have efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)