panel: have peak power

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
Siblings eminent domain
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.31
, topic
Weight: 0.31
, moderator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have peak power 1.00
have power 0.83
be given power 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(moderator, be given power)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(moderator, be given power)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(moderator, be given power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(panel, have peak power)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(panel, have power)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(panel, have power)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(panel, have power)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, have power)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(panel, have peak power)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(panel, have peak power)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(panel, have peak power)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(moderator, be given power)