panel: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
Siblings eminent domain
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.31
, topic
Weight: 0.31
, moderator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get cheaper 0.83
be cheaper on end 0.80
is cheap 0.79
beat expensive 0.77
cost money 0.77
is inefficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(board, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(issue, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(application, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(issue, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(court case, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panel, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panel, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panel, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panel, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panel, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panel, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(court case, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(court case, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(panel, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(panel, get cheaper)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(panel, get cheaper)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panel, get cheaper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(panel, is cheap)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(panel, beat expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(panel, is inefficient)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is cheap)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(panel, beat expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(panel, is inefficient)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(panel, beat expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(panel, is cheap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(panel, is inefficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(panel, is inefficient)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(panel, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(board, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(court case, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(board, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(panel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)