pant: have back pockets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.45
, wardrobe
Weight: 0.34
, pocket
Weight: 0.33
, nothing
Weight: 0.24
Siblings sweater
Weight: 0.31
, blouse
Weight: 0.31
, bra
Weight: 0.30
, thong
Weight: 0.30
, hair color
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have back pockets 1.00
come with pockets 0.95
have small pockets 0.94
have white pockets 0.93
has physical part pockets 0.92
have tiny pockets 0.91
have fake pockets 0.89
have shut pockets 0.86
have sewn together pockets 0.86
have sewn pockets 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thong, has physical part pockets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thong, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(thong, has physical part pockets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pant, have back pockets)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pant, have small pockets)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pant, has physical part pockets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pant, have tiny pockets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pant, have fake pockets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pant, have sewn together pockets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pant, have fake pockets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(pant, have tiny pockets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pant, have fake pockets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(pant, has physical part pockets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(pant, have small pockets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pant, has physical part pockets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pant, have tiny pockets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pant, have small pockets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pant, have tiny pockets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pant, have small pockets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pant, have fake pockets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pant, have sewn together pockets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pant, have sewn together pockets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pant, has physical part pockets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pant, have sewn together pockets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pant, have back pockets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pant, have back pockets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pant, have back pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(thong, has physical part pockets)