panty liner: has quality jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.49
Siblings conveyor belt
Weight: 0.30
, roller
Weight: 0.30
, lubrication
Weight: 0.29
, bulletproof vest
Weight: 0.29
, gimp
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality jokes 1.00
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gimp, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(gimp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gimp, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(panty liner, has quality jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(panty liner, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(panty liner, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(panty liner, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(panty liner, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(panty liner, has quality jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(panty liner, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(panty liner, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gimp, has quality bad)