papaya: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.67
, fruit
Weight: 0.64
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.64
, ingredient
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mango
Weight: 0.37
, apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, coconut
Weight: 0.37
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
smell bad 0.84
taste like vomit 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, smell bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pear tree, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pear tree, smell bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(papaya, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(papaya, taste like vomit)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(papaya, taste like vomit)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(papaya, taste like vomit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(papaya, taste like vomit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(papaya, smell bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(papaya, smell bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(papaya, smell bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(papaya, smell bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(papaya, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(papaya, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(papaya, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pear tree, smell bad)