paper towel: be at grocery store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.69
, restroom
Weight: 0.66
, paper
Weight: 0.62
, towel
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toilet paper
Weight: 0.71
, tissue
Weight: 0.56
, beach towel
Weight: 0.40
, trash bag
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grocery store 1.00
be at supermarket 0.91
be at store 0.90
be store in box 0.81
be at office supply store 0.80
be at drug store 0.78
be at restaurant 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(paper, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at grocery store)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(restroom, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at grocery store)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(paper, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at grocery store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(paper, be at grocery store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(restroom, be at restaurant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(paper, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(paper, be at grocery store)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(restroom, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(paper, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, be at grocery store)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, be at supermarket)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, be at drug store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, be at store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(paper, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(paper, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(restroom, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(toilet paper, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, be at grocery store)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(toilet paper, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, be at store)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(toilet paper, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, be at supermarket)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(toilet paper, be at drug store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, be at drug store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(paper towel, be at grocery store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at grocery store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(paper, be at store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(paper, be at grocery store)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(restroom, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(toilet paper, be at store)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toilet paper, be at grocery store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toilet paper, be at supermarket)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toilet paper, be at drug store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(paper, be at store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(paper, be at grocery store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(paper towel, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(restroom, be at restaurant)