paper towel: have designs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.69
, restroom
Weight: 0.66
, paper
Weight: 0.62
, towel
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toilet paper
Weight: 0.71
, tissue
Weight: 0.56
, bounty
Weight: 0.50
, beach towel
Weight: 0.40
, white paper
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have designs 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, have designs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, have designs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(paper towel, have designs)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(toilet paper, have designs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, have designs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(paper towel, have designs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(paper towel, have designs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(paper towel, have designs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(paper towel, have designs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, have designs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(paper towel, have designs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(paper towel, have designs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, have designs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(toilet paper, have designs)