paper towel: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.69
, restroom
Weight: 0.66
, paper
Weight: 0.62
, towel
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toilet paper
Weight: 0.71
, tissue
Weight: 0.56
, bounty
Weight: 0.50
, beach towel
Weight: 0.40
, white paper
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00
is insulator 0.98
is good insulators 0.87
is insulators 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(paper, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(paper, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(towel, is good insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(paper, is insulator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(towel, is good insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(paper, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(paper towel, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(paper towel, is insulators)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(paper towel, is insulator)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(paper, is insulator)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(towel, is good insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(paper, is insulator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(towel, is good insulator)