paper: affect environment

Related concepts

Parents	newspaper Weight: 0.68 , paper towel Weight: 0.68 , raw material Weight: 0.60 , publication Weight: 0.60
Siblings	toilet paper Weight: 0.71 , white paper Weight: 0.66 , paper currency Weight: 0.64 , thesis Weight: 0.61 , passport Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property	Similarity
affect environment	1.00
be harmful to environment	0.88
be bad for environment	0.87
affect ecosystems	0.82
affect life	0.82
save environment	0.81
affect people	0.79
be better than plastic for environment	0.77
impact perception	0.77
affect location of industry	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(paper, affect environment)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(paper, affect environment)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(paper, affect environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(paper, affect environment)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(paper, affect environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(paper, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(toilet paper, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(toilet paper, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(paper, affect environment)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(paper, be bad for environment)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect people)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(paper, affect people)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(paper, affect people)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(paper, affect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(paper, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(newspaper, be bad for environment)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(raw material, affect location of industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(toilet paper, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(newspaper, be bad for environment)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(paper, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(raw material, affect location of industry)