paper: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents newspaper
Weight: 0.68
, paper towel
Weight: 0.68
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, publication
Weight: 0.60
Siblings toilet paper
Weight: 0.71
, white paper
Weight: 0.66
, paper currency
Weight: 0.64
, thesis
Weight: 0.61
, passport
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
affect environment 0.87
be harmful to environment 0.86
be better than plastic for environment 0.83
save environment 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
be when good 0.77
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(paper towel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(newspaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(newspaper, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(thesis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(newspaper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(paper towel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(newspaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(toilet paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(thesis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(thesis, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(paper, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(paper, affect environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(paper, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(paper, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(paper, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(paper, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(paper, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(paper, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(paper, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(paper, affect environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(paper, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(paper, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(paper, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(newspaper, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(newspaper, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(toilet paper, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(thesis, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(newspaper, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(newspaper, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(paper, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality good)