:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
howl |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(papillon, howl)
⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dalmatian, howl)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(papillon, howl)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, howl)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(papillon, howl)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, howl)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, howl)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(papillon, howl)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(papillon, howl)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(papillon, howl)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(papillon, howl)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(papillon, howl)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dalmatian, howl)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(papillon, howl)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, howl)