paradox: is effective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, term
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liar
Weight: 0.50
, irony
Weight: 0.35
, duality
Weight: 0.34
, contradiction
Weight: 0.33
, dilemma
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is effective 1.00
be effective in literature 0.81
were effective against church 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(irony, were effective against church)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(irony, is effective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(irony, is effective)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(irony, is effective)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(irony, were effective against church)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(irony, were effective against church)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(paradox, is effective)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(paradox, be effective in literature)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against church)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(paradox, be effective in literature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(paradox, be effective in literature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(paradox, be effective in literature)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(paradox, were effective against church)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(paradox, were effective against church)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(paradox, were effective against church)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(paradox, is effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(paradox, is effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(irony, is effective)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(paradox, is effective)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(irony, were effective against church)