parakeet: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.60
, parrot
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.51
, creature
Weight: 0.46
Siblings budgerigar
Weight: 0.45
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, blue bird
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
make pets 0.93
is good pets 0.93
has state pet 0.91
is good pet 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(parrot, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(parakeet, has state pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(parrot, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(parrot, has state pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(parrot, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(parakeet, has state pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(parakeet, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(parakeet, make pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(parakeet, is good pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(parakeet, make pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(parakeet, is good pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(parakeet, has state pet)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(parakeet, make pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(parakeet, has state pet)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(parakeet, is good pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(parakeet, has state pet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(parakeet, is good pet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(parakeet, is good pet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(parakeet, is good pet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, is good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, has state pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, make pets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, is good pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(parakeet, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parrot, has state pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(parakeet, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parrot, has state pets)