parakeet: is good pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.60
, parrot
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.51
, creature
Weight: 0.46
Siblings budgerigar
Weight: 0.45
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, blue bird
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pet 1.00
has state pet 0.94
is good pets 0.91
make pets 0.86
has state pets 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(parrot, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(parakeet, is good pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(parrot, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(parrot, has state pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(parrot, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(parakeet, is good pet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(parakeet, is good pet)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(parakeet, has state pet)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(parakeet, has state pet)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(parakeet, is good pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(parakeet, has state pet)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(parakeet, is good pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(parakeet, is good pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(parakeet, make pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(parakeet, make pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(parakeet, has state pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(parakeet, has state pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(parakeet, make pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(parakeet, has state pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, has state pet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, is good pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, has state pets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, make pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, is good pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(parakeet, is good pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parrot, has state pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(parakeet, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parrot, has state pets)