paralegal: is paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.60
, office worker
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.57
, attorney
Weight: 0.57
Siblings accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.34
, clerk
Weight: 0.34
, counselor
Weight: 0.33
, solicitor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid little 1.00
get paid little 0.98
get paid 0.90
is paid 0.90
make little 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense attorney, get paid)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(counselor, is paid little)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(counselor, get paid)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(counselor, is paid)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(counselor, get paid little)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(counselor, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(counselor, is paid little)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(counselor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(counselor, get paid little)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(counselor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(counselor, get paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(counselor, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(counselor, is paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(defense attorney, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(defense attorney, get paid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(accountant, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(paralegal, is paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid little)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(paralegal, get paid little)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(paralegal, get paid little)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(paralegal, get paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, make little)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(paralegal, make little)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(paralegal, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(paralegal, make little)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(paralegal, is paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(paralegal, make little)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(paralegal, get paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(paralegal, is paid)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(paralegal, get paid)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(paralegal, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(paralegal, is paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(counselor, get paid little)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(counselor, is paid little)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(counselor, is paid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(counselor, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(defense attorney, get paid)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(accountant, get paid)