parallelism: be effective literary device for wisdom writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.53
, device
Weight: 0.53
, structure
Weight: 0.50
, matter
Weight: 0.50
Siblings throughput
Weight: 0.32
, syntax
Weight: 0.32
, topology
Weight: 0.32
, recursion
Weight: 0.32
, configuration
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be effective literary device for wisdom writing 1.00
be important in writing 0.81
be in writing 0.80
be important in poetry 0.79
is rhetorical device 0.79
be in poetry developed 0.79
be important part writing 0.78
be used in poetry 0.78
be important in literature 0.78
be in poetry 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(structure, be important in poetry)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be in poetry developed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(structure, be important part writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(structure, be in writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(structure, be in writing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in writing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(structure, be important part writing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(structure, be in poetry developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in poetry)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(structure, be in writing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(structure, be in poetry developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in poetry)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in writing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important part writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in poetry)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in writing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in literature)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(structure, be important in poetry)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be in poetry developed)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(structure, be important part writing)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(structure, be in writing)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(syntax, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(syntax, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in literature)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(syntax, be important in poetry)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in poetry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(parallelism, be used in poetry)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be used in poetry)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(parallelism, be used in poetry)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be used in poetry)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, is rhetorical device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(structure, be in writing)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(structure, be important part writing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(structure, be important in writing)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(structure, be in poetry developed)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(structure, be important in poetry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in writing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in literature)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in poetry)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(structure, be in writing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(structure, be important in writing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(structure, be important part writing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(structure, be important in poetry)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(structure, be in poetry developed)