parallelism: be important in literature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.53
, device
Weight: 0.53
, structure
Weight: 0.50
, matter
Weight: 0.50
Siblings throughput
Weight: 0.32
, syntax
Weight: 0.32
, topology
Weight: 0.32
, recursion
Weight: 0.32
, configuration
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in literature 1.00
be important in poetry 0.83
be used in poetry 0.79
be in poetry 0.78
be effective literary device for wisdom writing 0.78
be essential in study of language 0.78
be important in writing 0.77
be important in linguistics 0.77
be in poetry developed 0.77
be important in music 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(structure, be important in poetry)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be important in music)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be in poetry developed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in poetry)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in writing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(structure, be in poetry developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in music)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in poetry)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(structure, be in poetry developed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in writing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in music)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in literature)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in poetry)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in linguistics)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be essential in study of language)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in writing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(structure, be important in poetry)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be important in music)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(structure, be in poetry developed)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(syntax, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in literature)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(syntax, be important in poetry)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in poetry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(syntax, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(syntax, be essential in study of language)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(syntax, be essential in study of language)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(syntax, be important in linguistics)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in linguistics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(parallelism, be important in literature)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(parallelism, be used in poetry)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be used in poetry)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(parallelism, be used in poetry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be used in poetry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(structure, be important in poetry)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(structure, be important in writing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(structure, be in poetry developed)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(structure, be important in music)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in literature)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in writing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in poetry)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(syntax, be essential in study of language)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in linguistics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(structure, be important in poetry)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(structure, be important in writing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(structure, be in poetry developed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(parallelism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(structure, be important in music)