parallelism: is rhetorical device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.53
, device
Weight: 0.53
, structure
Weight: 0.50
, matter
Weight: 0.50
Siblings throughput
Weight: 0.32
, syntax
Weight: 0.32
, topology
Weight: 0.32
, recursion
Weight: 0.32
, configuration
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rhetorical device 1.00
is rhetorical 0.92
is device 0.83
be effective literary device for wisdom writing 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(parallelism, is rhetorical device)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(parallelism, is rhetorical)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, is rhetorical)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(parallelism, is device)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, is device)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(parallelism, is device)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(parallelism, is rhetorical)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(parallelism, is rhetorical)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(parallelism, is device)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(parallelism, be effective literary device for wisdom writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, is rhetorical device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(parallelism, is rhetorical device)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(parallelism, is rhetorical device)