paralysis: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.67
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, complication
Weight: 0.60
, symptom
Weight: 0.60
Siblings blindness
Weight: 0.35
, coma
Weight: 0.34
, dislocation
Weight: 0.34
, mental illness
Weight: 0.34
, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worse 0.84
has quality question 0.77
has consistency density 0.77
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paralysis, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paralysis, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paralysis, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(injury, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(paralysis, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(paralysis, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paralysis, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(paralysis, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paralysis, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dislocation, has consistency density)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(paralysis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)