parent: be over protective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sister
Weight: 0.66
, loser
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, child
Weight: 0.62
Siblings neighbor
Weight: 0.62
, mom
Weight: 0.35
, mother
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be over protective 1.00
is protective 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mom, be over protective)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mother, is protective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mom, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mom, be over protective)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mother, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mother, is protective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(parent, be over protective)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(parent, is protective)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(parent, is protective)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(parent, is protective)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(parent, is protective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(parent, be over protective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(parent, be over protective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mom, be over protective)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(parent, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mother, is protective)