park ranger: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be at state park 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(park ranger, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(park ranger, be at park)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(park ranger, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(park ranger, be at state park)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(park ranger, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(park ranger, be at state park)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(park ranger, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(park ranger, be at state park)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(park ranger, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(park ranger, be at state park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(park ranger, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(park ranger, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(park ranger, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(park ranger, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(park ranger, be at park)