park: be considered achievement in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered achievement in science 1.00
achievement in science 0.98
be considered achievement 0.95
be important in science 0.85
be important in math 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(property, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(park, be considered achievement in science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(property, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(property, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement in science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(central park, achievement in science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(property, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(central park, achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(central park, achievement in science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(central park, be considered achievement)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(central park, be considered achievement in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(park, be considered achievement in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(park, be considered achievement in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(property, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(central park, be considered achievement in science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(central park, achievement in science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(central park, be considered achievement)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(property, be important in science)