park: be important in cities

Related concepts

Parents	location Weight: 0.67 , playground Weight: 0.67 , site Weight: 0.66 , attraction Weight: 0.66 , property Weight: 0.63
Siblings	central park Weight: 0.89 , yellowstone national park Weight: 0.80 , death valley Weight: 0.68 , joshua tree Weight: 0.67 , walt disney world Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in cities	1.00
have necessary in big cities system	0.90
be important in towns	0.88
help growth of cities	0.87
be important to people of city	0.83
be important to people of new city	0.81
affect regions culture	0.78
be in city help	0.78
affect regions climate	0.76
help communities	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(location, help growth of cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(location, affect regions culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(location, affect regions climate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(location, help growth of cities)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(location, affect regions climate)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(location, affect regions culture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(location, help growth of cities)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(location, affect regions culture)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(location, affect regions climate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(location, help growth of cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(park, be important in cities)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(location, affect regions culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(park, be important in cities)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(location, affect regions climate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(park, be important in cities)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of city)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(park, be important in cities)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(park, be important in towns)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(park, be important in towns)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(park, have necessary in big cities system)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(park, be important in towns)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(park, be in city help)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(park, be in city help)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(park, be in city help)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(park, help communities)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in towns)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(park, help communities)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(park, help communities)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(park, help communities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(location, affect regions climate)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(location, affect regions culture)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(location, help growth of cities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(location, help growth of cities)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(location, affect regions climate)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(park, be important in cities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(location, affect regions culture)