park: be important to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to environment 1.00
help environment 0.90
has state environment 0.88
protect environment 0.85
is extreme environment 0.83
be important in economic system 0.80
be important in system 0.80
be important to life 0.80
be important for life 0.79
be important in society 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(property, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(park, be important to environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(property, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(park, be important to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(property, be important in society)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(property, be important to life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(property, be important in society)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(property, be important to life)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(death valley, has state environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is extreme environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(property, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(park, be important to environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(property, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(park, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(death valley, has state environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(death valley, has state environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(death valley, is extreme environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(death valley, is extreme environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(park, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(park, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(property, be important in society)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(property, be important to life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(death valley, is extreme environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(death valley, has state environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(property, be important to life)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(property, be important in society)