park: be in cambridge called

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in cambridge called 1.00
be in london 0.77
be in nyc 0.77
be in blackpool 0.76
be in colorado 0.76
be in france 0.76
be expensive in montana 0.75
be in london expensive 0.75
is uk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(property, be in france)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(park, be in cambridge called)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(site, is uk)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(park, be in cambridge called)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(site, is uk)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(property, be in france)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(property, be in france)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(site, is uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(central park, be in nyc)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(property, be in france)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(park, be in cambridge called)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(site, is uk)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(park, be in cambridge called)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(central park, be in nyc)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(central park, be in nyc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(park, be in cambridge called)

Similarity expansion

0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be in colorado)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(park, be in colorado)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(park, be in colorado)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(park, be in cambridge called)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(site, is uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(property, be in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(central park, be in nyc)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(site, is uk)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(park, be in cambridge called)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(property, be in france)