parole: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prisoner
Weight: 0.56
, sentence
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.54
, consideration
Weight: 0.54
, reason
Weight: 0.54
Siblings imprisonment
Weight: 0.34
, prison guard
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.32
, bail
Weight: 0.32
, cardiac arrest
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality right 0.88
has quality wrong 0.87
is bad people 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
be in good shape 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sentence, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(parole, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prisoner, be in good shape)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(parole, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(prisoner, be in good shape)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sentence, has quality right)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sentence, has quality right)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, be in good shape)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bail, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bail, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, has quality right)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(bail, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bail, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sentence, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(prisoner, be in good shape)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(parole, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(capital punishment, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, has quality right)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bail, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bail, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bail, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(bail, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(bail, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bail, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(capital punishment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, is good thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(bail, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(bail, is bad thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(capital punishment, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(parole, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(parole, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(parole, is bad thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(parole, is bad thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(parole, is bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(parole, is good thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(parole, is good thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(parole, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(parole, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(parole, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(parole, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(parole, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(parole, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sentence, has quality right)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(prisoner, be in good shape)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bail, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bail, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(capital punishment, has quality right)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(capital punishment, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bail, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(capital punishment, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bail, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(prisoner, be in good shape)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(parole, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sentence, has quality right)