parrot: live in rainforest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, bird
Weight: 0.60
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.54
Siblings macaw
Weight: 0.65
, parakeet
Weight: 0.56
, lovebird
Weight: 0.54
, cockatoo
Weight: 0.48
, kea
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in rainforest 1.00
be from rainforest 0.96
be important to rainforest 0.94
survive in rainforest 0.93
adapt in rainforest 0.90
adapt to rainforest 0.90
be adapted to rainforest 0.88
be adapted to tropical rainforest 0.87
live in canopy layer of rainforest 0.87
live in rain forest 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(parrot, live in rainforest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(macaw, live in rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(macaw, adapt in rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(macaw, adapt to rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(parrot, live in rainforest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(macaw, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(macaw, live in rainforest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(macaw, adapt to rainforest)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(macaw, adapt to rainforest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(macaw, adapt in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(macaw, adapt in rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(parrot, live in rainforest)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(parrot, be from rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(parrot, be from rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, be from rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(parrot, be from rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(parrot, live in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(macaw, live in rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(macaw, adapt in rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(macaw, adapt to rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(parrot, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)