parsnip: be better than potatoes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.61
, vegetable
Weight: 0.60
, root
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, winter
Weight: 0.49
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.36
, radish
Weight: 0.36
, parsley
Weight: 0.36
, kale
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than potatoes 1.00
be better than potato 0.93
be more expensive than carrots 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, be better than potatoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cauliflower, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, be better than potatoes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(parsnip, be better than potatoes)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be better than potato)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(parsnip, be better than potato)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(parsnip, be better than potato)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(parsnip, be better than potato)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be better than potatoes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(parsnip, be better than potatoes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cauliflower, be better than potatoes)