part: be expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.64
Siblings heating element
Weight: 0.68
, step
Weight: 0.67
, body part
Weight: 0.65
, figure
Weight: 0.64
, hub
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in canada 1.00
be much more expensive in canada 0.96
be cheaper in america 0.82
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(step, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(figure, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(figure, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(figure, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(step, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(step, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(part, be expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(part, be much more expensive in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(part, be much more expensive in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(part, be much more expensive in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(part, be much more expensive in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(part, be cheaper in america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(part, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(part, be cheaper in america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(part, be cheaper in america)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(part, be cheaper in america)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(part, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(part, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(part, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(part, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(part, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(figure, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(part, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, is expensive)