partition: be useful in computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings computer disk
Weight: 0.33
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.32
, manila folder
Weight: 0.32
, attachment
Weight: 0.31
, computer architecture
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in computer 1.00
be useful 0.85
is useful 0.85
slow down computer 0.80
have important software 0.79
have software 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(application, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(partition, be useful in computer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(application, have important software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(partition, be useful in computer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(application, have software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(partition, be useful in computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(application, have software)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(application, is useful)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(application, have important software)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(application, is useful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(application, have important software)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(application, have software)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fragmentation, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fragmentation, slow down computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(application, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(partition, be useful in computer)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(application, have important software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(partition, be useful in computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(application, have software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(partition, be useful in computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fragmentation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fragmentation, is useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fragmentation, slow down computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fragmentation, slow down computer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(computer architecture, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(partition, be useful in computer)

Similarity expansion

0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(partition, is useful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(partition, is useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(partition, is useful)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(partition, be useful in computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(application, have important software)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(application, have software)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fragmentation, is useful)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer architecture, be useful)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fragmentation, slow down computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(application, have software)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(partition, be useful in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(application, have important software)