partner: be employees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.71
, attorney
Weight: 0.65
, manager
Weight: 0.63
, user
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law firm
Weight: 0.68
, owner
Weight: 0.67
, representative
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
, spouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be employees 1.00
CAN can employees 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(partner, be employees)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(partner, CAN can employees)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(partner, CAN can employees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(partner, CAN can employees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(partner, CAN can employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(partner, be employees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(partner, be employees)