partner: become abusive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.71
, attorney
Weight: 0.65
, manager
Weight: 0.63
, user
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law firm
Weight: 0.68
, owner
Weight: 0.67
, representative
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
, spouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
become abusive 1.00
is abusive 0.97
stay in abusive relationships 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(spouse, is abusive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(spouse, is abusive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(spouse, is abusive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(partner, become abusive)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(partner, is abusive)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(partner, is abusive)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(partner, is abusive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(partner, is abusive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(partner, stay in abusive relationships)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(partner, become abusive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(partner, become abusive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spouse, is abusive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(partner, become abusive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)