partner: change existing relationships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.71
, attorney
Weight: 0.65
, manager
Weight: 0.63
, user
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law firm
Weight: 0.68
, owner
Weight: 0.67
, representative
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
, spouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
change existing relationships 1.00
change relationships 0.92
has state relationships 0.86
stay in relationships 0.84
be previous relationships 0.83
stay in abusive relationships 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(spouse, stay in relationships)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(spouse, stay in relationships)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(spouse, stay in relationships)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(partner, change existing relationships)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(partner, stay in relationships)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(partner, change relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(partner, change relationships)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(partner, stay in relationships)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(partner, change relationships)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(partner, stay in relationships)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(partner, has state relationships)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(partner, be previous relationships)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(partner, change relationships)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(partner, has state relationships)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(partner, has state relationships)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(partner, be previous relationships)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(partner, has state relationships)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(partner, be previous relationships)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(partner, be previous relationships)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(partner, stay in relationships)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(partner, change existing relationships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(spouse, stay in relationships)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(partner, change existing relationships)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)