partner: cheat in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.71
, attorney
Weight: 0.65
, manager
Weight: 0.63
, user
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law firm
Weight: 0.68
, owner
Weight: 0.67
, representative
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
, spouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
cheat in relationship 1.00
cheat 0.88
stay in relationships 0.80
change relationships 0.80
has state relationships 0.80
stay in abusive relationships 0.79
be previous relationships 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(spouse, cheat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(spouse, stay in relationships)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(spouse, cheat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(spouse, cheat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(spouse, stay in relationships)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(spouse, stay in relationships)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(partner, cheat in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(partner, cheat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(partner, cheat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(partner, cheat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(partner, stay in relationships)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(partner, cheat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(partner, change relationships)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(partner, stay in abusive relationships)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(partner, stay in relationships)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(partner, change relationships)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(partner, has state relationships)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(partner, change relationships)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(partner, stay in relationships)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(partner, be previous relationships)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(partner, be previous relationships)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(partner, has state relationships)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(partner, change relationships)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(partner, has state relationships)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(partner, be previous relationships)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(partner, has state relationships)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(partner, be previous relationships)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(partner, stay in relationships)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(partner, cheat in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(spouse, cheat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(spouse, stay in relationships)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(partner, cheat in relationship)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(spouse, stay in abusive relationships)