partner: fall out of love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.71
, attorney
Weight: 0.65
, manager
Weight: 0.63
, user
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law firm
Weight: 0.68
, owner
Weight: 0.67
, representative
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
, spouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall out of love 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(partner, fall out of love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spouse, fall out of love)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, fall out of love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(spouse, fall out of love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spouse, fall out of love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, fall out of love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(partner, fall out of love)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(partner, fall out of love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(partner, fall out of love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(partner, fall out of love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, fall out of love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(partner, fall out of love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(partner, fall out of love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spouse, fall out of love)