party: be bad for country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents birthday party
Weight: 0.86
, political party
Weight: 0.82
, third party
Weight: 0.77
, socialist party
Weight: 0.77
Siblings labour party
Weight: 0.95
, conservative party
Weight: 0.84
, communist party
Weight: 0.83
, liberal party
Weight: 0.82
, democratic party
Weight: 0.81

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for country 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
be bad for democracy 0.79
be good for america 0.79
is good thing 0.78
be hard for people 0.76
be good for democracy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(political party, be good for democracy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(party, be bad for country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(political party, be bad for democracy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(party, be bad for country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(political party, be bad for democracy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(political party, be good for democracy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(political party, be bad for democracy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(political party, be good for democracy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(political party, be good for democracy)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(party, be bad for country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(political party, be bad for democracy)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(party, be bad for country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(conservative party, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(conservative party, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(party, be bad for country)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(party, be bad for democracy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(party, be bad for democracy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(party, be bad for democracy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(party, be bad for democracy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(party, be hard for people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(party, be good for democracy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(party, be hard for people)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(party, be good for america)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(party, be good for democracy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for democracy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(party, be hard for people)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(party, be hard for people)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(party, be good for america)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(party, be good for democracy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(party, be bad for country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(party, be bad for country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(political party, be bad for democracy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(political party, be good for democracy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(political party, be bad for democracy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(party, be bad for country)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(political party, be good for democracy)