party: be best paired with children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents birthday party
Weight: 0.86
, political party
Weight: 0.82
, third party
Weight: 0.77
, socialist party
Weight: 0.77
Siblings labour party
Weight: 0.95
, conservative party
Weight: 0.84
, communist party
Weight: 0.83
, liberal party
Weight: 0.82
, democratic party
Weight: 0.81

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best paired with children 1.00
is best 0.76
get matched up with people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(conservative party, is best)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(conservative party, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(party, be best paired with children)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(party, get matched up with people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(party, get matched up with people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(party, get matched up with people)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(party, get matched up with people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(party, be best paired with children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(party, be best paired with children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(party, be best paired with children)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conservative party, is best)