party: be good for america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents birthday party
Weight: 0.86
, political party
Weight: 0.82
, third party
Weight: 0.77
, socialist party
Weight: 0.77
Siblings labour party
Weight: 0.95
, conservative party
Weight: 0.84
, communist party
Weight: 0.83
, liberal party
Weight: 0.82
, democratic party
Weight: 0.81

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for america 1.00
be in america 0.95
be organized in america 0.85
be important to american system 0.84
survive in uk england 0.81
be in usa 0.81
is england 0.80
work in england 0.80
be bad for country 0.79
be important in canada 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(political party, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(political party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(political party, be organized in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(third party, survive in uk england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(political party, be in america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(political party, be organized in america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(third party, survive in uk england)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(political party, be important in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(third party, survive in uk england)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(political party, be in america)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(political party, be important in canada)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(political party, be organized in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, is england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(political party, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(party, be good for america)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(political party, be organized in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(party, be good for america)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(political party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(party, be good for america)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(third party, survive in uk england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(party, be good for america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(conservative party, is england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(conservative party, is england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(party, be good for america)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(party, be organized in america)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(party, be bad for country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(party, be organized in america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(party, be organized in america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(party, be important in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(party, be bad for country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(party, be bad for country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(party, be bad for country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(party, be organized in america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(party, be important in canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(third party, survive in uk england)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(political party, be in america)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(political party, be organized in america)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(political party, be important in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conservative party, is england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(political party, be in america)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(political party, be organized in america)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(third party, survive in uk england)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(party, be good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(political party, be important in canada)